ABSTRACT
Introduction: With the COVID-19 pandemic, a “new normal” on how surgeons and intensivists perform tracheotomy in COVID-19 patients is essential. We aim to summarize the recommendations and present the supporting evidence of these recommendations. Methods A search of published works on tracheotomy, tracheostomy, COVID-19, novel coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2 was performed on PubMed/MEDLINE/Cochrane Library. Articles relevant to the practice of tracheotomy on patients with COVID-19 were selected. The articles were then reviewed and divided into 4 key categories: 1) Personal protective equipment (PPE) in COVID-19 positive patients, 2) Adjunctive measures of airway management before definitive intervention in COVID-19 positive patients; 3) Timing of tracheotomy in COVID-19 positive patients; and 4) Perioperative considerations in performing tracheotomy in COVID-19 positive patients. Results and key points Firstly, enhanced PPE is recommended during tracheotomy of COVID-19 positive patients. Secondly, adjunctive airway management before definitive intervention includes the use of high flow nasal cannulas (HFNC). Thirdly, non-invasive ventilation via continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP) machines are not recommended. Fourth, the general consensus suggests that timing of tracheotomy should be at least 10 days after intubation. Finally, percutaneous dilatational tracheotomy (PDT) is likely to be associated with a lower risk of transmission of the virus to healthcare workers (HCW) than a surgical tracheotomy (ST). Other key precautions would include minimizing the use of diathermy. Conclusions The “new normal” workflow summarizes the ideal recommendations across published societal guidelines. Enhanced PPE should be recommended whenever possible. Adjunctive measures before definitive intervention of COVID-19 patients should be limited to the use of HFNC, and CPAP/BiPAP should be avoided. Tracheotomy should be performed after 10 days, although the long term sequelae of tracheal stenosis and pulmonary fibrosis should be ascertained with this approach.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Tracheal StenosisABSTRACT
We present a comprehensive analysis of antibody and cellular responses in children aged 12-16 years who received COVID-19 vaccination with ChAdOx1 (n=6) or mRNA vaccine (mRNA-1273 or BNT162b2, n=9) using a 12-week extended-interval schedule. mRNA vaccination of seropositive children induces high antibody levels, with one dose, but a second dose is required in infection-naïve children. Following a second ChAdOx1 dose, antibody titres were higher than natural infection, but lower than mRNA vaccination. Vaccination induced live virus neutralising antibodies against Alpha, Beta and Delta variants, however, a second dose is required in infection-naïve children. We found higher T-cell responses following mRNA vaccination than ChAdOx1. Phenotyping of responses showed predominantly early effector-memory CD4 T cell populations, with a type-1 cytotoxic cytokine signature, with IL-10. These data demonstrate mRNA vaccination induces a co-ordinated superior antibody and robust cellular responses in children. Seronegative children require a prime-boost regime for optimal protection.
Subject(s)
COVID-19ABSTRACT
SARS-CoV-2 is the etiologic agent of the current COVID-19 pandemic which has wreaked unprecedented economic and healthcare calamity. It is a deadly virus belonging to the Coronaviridae family, with high sequence similarity to the 2003 SARS epidemic coronavirus 1. The global race to produce vaccines to stem the disease-as well as the public health urgency-has spurred tremendous growth in the litany of literature which attempts to uncover the enigma of this deadly virus. Amidst this evergrowing list of literature , this paper seeks to concisely elaborate on key progresses made in the understanding of SARS-CoV-2 in the realms of its life cycle, epidemiology, methods for detection, and vaccine research into an easily assimilable paper for readers.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Coronavirus InfectionsABSTRACT
Purpose: The COVID-19 pandemic has caused significant confusion about healthcare providers and patients pandemic-specific risks related to surgery. The aim of this systematic review is to summarize recommendations for sinus and anterior skull base surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: PubMed/MEDLINE, Google Scholar, Scopus and Embase were searched by two independent otolaryngologists from the Young Otolaryngologists of IFOS (YO-IFOS) for studies dealing with sinus and skull base surgery during COVID-19 pandemic. The review also included unpublished guidelines edited by Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery or Neurosurgery societies. Perioperative factors were investigated including surgical indications, preoperative testing of patients, practical management in operating rooms, technical aspects of surgery and postoperative management. The literature review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. The criteria for considering studies or guidelines for the review were based on the population, intervention, comparison, outcome, timing and setting (PICOTS) framework. Results: 15 international publications met inclusion criteria. Five references were guidelines from national societies. All guidelines recommended postponing elective surgeries. An algorithm is proposed that classifies endonasal surgical procedures into three groups based on the risk of postponing surgery. Patients COVID-19 status should be preoperatively assessed. Highest level of personal protective equipment (PPE) is recommended, and the use of high-speed powered devices should be avoided. Face-to-face postoperative visits must be limited. Conclusions: Sinus and skull base surgeries are high-risk procedures due to potential aerosolization of SARS-CoV-2 virus. Protection of health care workers by decreasing exposure and optimizing use of PPE is essential with sinus and anterior skull base surgery.